100% serious legit bannable offences

Do whatever you want here. Anything goes. (EDIT: July 2020, board is back up and working!)

Moderators: klefmop, neck_cannon, Andrew, thebigmin, steven

ryanatwood
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 11:57 am

Re: 100% serious legit bannable offences

Post by ryanatwood »

band cunts who only post in the photo thread.
smoke weed everday

User avatar
thisisours
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 9:35 pm
Location: texas

Re: 100% serious legit bannable offences

Post by thisisours »

new jacks that use the term skramz

User avatar
trent_pee
Posts: 147
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 5:45 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Contact:

Re: 100% serious legit bannable offences

Post by trent_pee »

thievesguild wrote:absolutely no sex in the champagne room.
Image

CitizenOfUlysses
Posts: 1045
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 7:38 pm

Re: 100% serious legit bannable offences

Post by CitizenOfUlysses »

.
Last edited by CitizenOfUlysses on Sat Jul 18, 2020 7:45 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Pete > You
Posts: 1662
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 6:01 pm
Location: Tennessee
Contact:

Re: 100% serious legit bannable offences

Post by Pete > You »

Contemplating denial of objective reality being a bannable offense.

Thoughts?

User avatar
lrysbrng
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 7:33 pm
Location: las vegas
Contact:

Re: 100% serious legit bannable offences

Post by lrysbrng »

thisisours wrote:new jacks that use the term skramz
when did this become uncool?
i have nils' full name tattoo'd on me.
Image

User avatar
omartakesthesquare
Posts: 104
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 12:01 am

Re: 100% serious legit bannable offences

Post by omartakesthesquare »

showing a slight interest in Get Fucked
you are watching as the world turns

Phil
Posts: 352
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 2:55 pm

Re: 100% serious legit bannable offences

Post by Phil »

Pete > You wrote:Contemplating denial of objective reality being a bannable offense.

Thoughts?
I always assumed that was better known as "being an idiot."
brianutatx wrote:You are just a wiener rock apologist. Down with wiener rock occupation and down with Topshelf!

User avatar
brianutatx
Posts: 1414
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 7:32 pm
Location: Austin TX

Re: 100% serious legit bannable offences

Post by brianutatx »

Phil wrote:
Pete > You wrote:Contemplating denial of objective reality being a bannable offense.

Thoughts?
I always assumed that was better known as "being an idiot."
What are y'all, Hindu or something? Do you believe in the Brahmin. I in all seriousness don't believe there is an objective reality. Reality is built by consciousness, their is no reality with out conscious minds and perception of reality is 100% unique to each individual thus making it subjective.

Phil what do you base your idea of an objective reality upon? Let's see who the real idiot is here.
Image

User avatar
buckytoole
Posts: 578
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:05 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: 100% serious legit bannable offences

Post by buckytoole »

brianutatx wrote:
Phil wrote:
Pete > You wrote:Contemplating denial of objective reality being a bannable offense.

Thoughts?
I always assumed that was better known as "being an idiot."
What are y'all, Hindu or something? Do you believe in the Brahmin. I in all seriousness don't believe there is an objective reality. Reality is built by consciousness, their is no reality with out conscious minds and perception of reality is 100% unique to each individual thus making it subjective.

Phil what do you base your idea of an objective reality upon? Let's see who the real idiot is here.
Image

Post Reply