Saetia V-Neck-Dude Interview

Do whatever you want here. Anything goes. (EDIT: July 2020, board is back up and working!)

Moderators: klefmop, neck_cannon, Andrew, thebigmin, steven

User avatar
dannzac
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2011 1:09 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Saetia V-Neck-Dude Interview

Post by dannzac »

lol this thread made me login for the first time in like a year to inb4 someone bringing up freedom of speech.

also
Cpt9Ball wrote:
wscbhg wrote: So if someone writes a book in which the main character is a naziskin would you all assume the writer is a nazi?
I think the difference is being able to tell if it's clearly a fictitious character or if the character appears to be a medium for the author's personal beliefs, statements, etc. For example in Kurt Vonnegut's Slapstick, when the protagonist and his sister have an incestual orgy, no one thinks it's Vonnegut saying it, as it's clear it's the character speaking. Meanwhile, Soren Kierkegaard writing as Victor Heremita in Either/Or, is still associated with the sexist thought present in the work, as Victor is seen as Kierkegaard himself. Likewise, people think Saetia V-Neck Dude is an extension of you, whether or not it actually is. And you seeming to take personal offense on behalf of Saetia guy's statements isn't exactly differentiating between the two of you. And if you have to outright state the character is "clearly a parody," it probably isn't clear. I also don't understand if Saetia guy is supposed to be a caricature of the type of person you dislike why you wouldn't agree with people being upset toward him. If he's supposed to be a character worthy of hate, disgust, etc. shouldn't you encourage it? The main issue is that people aren't seeing the difference between creator and created, and if you don't want to be the butt end of hate, you need to make the difference more clear and be able to separate yourself from your creation.
^^^

User avatar
klefmop
Posts: 660
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:10 am
Location: Michigan

Re: Saetia V-Neck-Dude Interview

Post by klefmop »

Cpt9Ball wrote:
wscbhg wrote: So if someone writes a book in which the main character is a naziskin would you all assume the writer is a nazi?
I think the difference is being able to tell if it's clearly a fictitious character or if the character appears to be a medium for the author's personal beliefs, statements, etc. For example in Kurt Vonnegut's Slapstick, when the protagonist and his sister have an incestual orgy, no one thinks it's Vonnegut saying it, as it's clear it's the character speaking. Meanwhile, Soren Kierkegaard writing as Victor Heremita in Either/Or, is still associated with the sexist thought present in the work, as Victor is seen as Kierkegaard himself. Likewise, people think Saetia V-Neck Dude is an extension of you, whether or not it actually is. And you seeming to take personal offense on behalf of Saetia guy's statements isn't exactly differentiating between the two of you. And if you have to outright state the character is "clearly a parody," it probably isn't clear. I also don't understand if Saetia guy is supposed to be a caricature of the type of person you dislike why you wouldn't agree with people being upset toward him. If he's supposed to be a character worthy of hate, disgust, etc. shouldn't you encourage it? The main issue is that people aren't seeing the difference between creator and created, and if you don't want to be the butt end of hate, you need to make the difference more clear and be able to separate yourself from your creation.
Image
thebigmin wrote:Screamo Will Never Die

-thebigmin

User avatar
Febcanl
Posts: 121
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:25 am
Location: Leiden, The Netherlands

Re: Saetia V-Neck-Dude Interview

Post by Febcanl »

Cpt9Ball wrote:
wscbhg wrote: So if someone writes a book in which the main character is a naziskin would you all assume the writer is a nazi?
I think the difference is being able to tell if it's clearly a fictitious character or if the character appears to be a medium for the author's personal beliefs, statements, etc. For example in Kurt Vonnegut's Slapstick, when the protagonist and his sister have an incestual orgy, no one thinks it's Vonnegut saying it, as it's clear it's the character speaking. Meanwhile, Soren Kierkegaard writing as Victor Heremita in Either/Or, is still associated with the sexist thought present in the work, as Victor is seen as Kierkegaard himself. Likewise, people think Saetia V-Neck Dude is an extension of you, whether or not it actually is. And you seeming to take personal offense on behalf of Saetia guy's statements isn't exactly differentiating between the two of you. And if you have to outright state the character is "clearly a parody," it probably isn't clear. I also don't understand if Saetia guy is supposed to be a caricature of the type of person you dislike why you wouldn't agree with people being upset toward him. If he's supposed to be a character worthy of hate, disgust, etc. shouldn't you encourage it? The main issue is that people aren't seeing the difference between creator and created, and if you don't want to be the butt end of hate, you need to make the difference more clear and be able to separate yourself from your creation.
I almost climaxed because of this intellectual, well reasoned argument. Thank you.

User avatar
CharlieBronson
Posts: 576
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 7:26 am

Re: Saetia V-Neck-Dude Interview

Post by CharlieBronson »

Cpt9Ball wrote:
wscbhg wrote: So if someone writes a book in which the main character is a naziskin would you all assume the writer is a nazi?
I think the difference is being able to tell if it's clearly a fictitious character or if the character appears to be a medium for the author's personal beliefs, statements, etc. For example in Kurt Vonnegut's Slapstick, when the protagonist and his sister have an incestual orgy, no one thinks it's Vonnegut saying it, as it's clear it's the character speaking. Meanwhile, Soren Kierkegaard writing as Victor Heremita in Either/Or, is still associated with the sexist thought present in the work, as Victor is seen as Kierkegaard himself. Likewise, people think Saetia V-Neck Dude is an extension of you, whether or not it actually is. And you seeming to take personal offense on behalf of Saetia guy's statements isn't exactly differentiating between the two of you. And if you have to outright state the character is "clearly a parody," it probably isn't clear. I also don't understand if Saetia guy is supposed to be a caricature of the type of person you dislike why you wouldn't agree with people being upset toward him. If he's supposed to be a character worthy of hate, disgust, etc. shouldn't you encourage it? The main issue is that people aren't seeing the difference between creator and created, and if you don't want to be the butt end of hate, you need to make the difference more clear and be able to separate yourself from your creation.

OATH!!!
CharlieBronson wrote: Things truly are sucklical in music

User avatar
thebigmin
Posts: 1570
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Contact:

Re: Saetia V-Neck-Dude Interview

Post by thebigmin »

saetia vneck guy is tight

Post Reply