OSAMA IS DEAD

[Pete > You]

impetus is important. i think of it every time i speed but like, really, i'm awesome and got space to go faster than these assholes... my argument for police.

conservatives won majority in canada tonight (yeah, elections, crazy)
pretty weak.

I don't follow.

[Karst]

Now I can create my hijacker sKraMz band osaetia bin laden.

[grind/bro]

He is with Dimebag now.

[jrdn]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... er-77.html

god damn u idiotzzzz, it confuses me so much why more London bombings would be planned when it was US forces that killed him?

anyway, it was a bit weird how they killed him then hastily chucked him in the sea showing no proof to anyone... the people who say the government was behind 9/11 will be having a field day.

also confused me why they never thought to check a mansion with high compound walls surrounding more or less right beside a military base that apparently had no amenities running to it, in which the occupants burned their trash instead of the regular way of disposing of it. the military baffles me.

[Pete > You]

While I agree with you, it's not our fault your government imports muslims by the millions while simultaneously deculturing the native population.

I've already seen one video of Alex Jones saying it was a hoax. I didn't go looking for shit like that, it just came to me via a friend. I'm confident it is only the tip of the iceberg of the "Osama's death was a hoax!" phenomenon. I mean, everyone knows that the Osama doesn't really exist, he was just Dick Cheney in a fake beard, funny hat, and white dress. Duh.

As for the mansion thing, that isn't so hard to understand. Given the facilities and the location, it is pretty much guaranteed that the elements of the Pakistani government knew about it. It was in their interests to keep everyone else unaware of it, so it's not like coalition intelligence services just missed it on a map or something.

[jrdn]

rip obama

[brianutatx]

This regulation seems necessary, since alcohol is consumed it needs to be carefully regulated to make sure it is safe to drink. It's similar to how food establishments need to acquire licences to sell food, mainly because of health concerns. There Are plenty of places where you can drink alcohol in my city where the establishment doesn't have a license, these places are typically called BYOB restaurants or bars etc. Usually any place that is privately owned it is legal to drink there. The issue comes with alcohol sales rather than consumption. Really the only place it's not legal to drink are public spaces.

Oh. Okay, you're just a brutal authoritarian. Got ya.

For real though the freedom to drink should be one of the last things on your list of things that need to change when it comes to freedom.

I'm a brutal authoritarian because I support consumer health laws? So consumer health laws are brutally authoritarian. Are you also pissed that companies that make poison have to label their poison as poison. Are you bummed that cigarettes can't be sold to kids? Isn't a bummer that US car companies are so heavily regulated due to consumer health laws, I wish they could still build the death traps they made in the 1920s so I had a much better chance of dying if I was in a car wreck.

Your silly as hell dude, consumer health laws have benefited everyone far more than they have hurt them. If you disagree site examples why all these "brutally authoritarian" consumer health laws need to be done away with.

For real though the freedom to drink should be one of the last things on your list of things that need to change when it comes to freedom.

It wasn't an example of something I feel strongly about, just the longest-lasting example of "WE NEED TO REMOVE YOUR RIGHTS TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS! THINK OF THE CHILDREN!" type shit I could think of. My point wasn't that we don't have these specific rights, but rather the fact that we almost never any of them back once they're gone, even if the impetus behind why they were removed in the first place no longer exists

I cited an example of a right that was taken away and granted back to us. Drinking alcohol legally.

Heres another right that was taken away. The right to carry firearms on college campuses. Guess what it's 2011 and now there are many states making it legal to carry firearms on college campuses. Even though just about every police force across the nation believes this will only lead to more deaths on college campuses, the good ole NRA has enough money to get our gun rights back. Let me ask you do you support having guns on college campuses? My second question would be have you gone to school that is infamous for college shootings? Cause I did, and I don't support guns on campuses.

[buckytoole]

As for the mansion thing, that isn't so hard to understand. Given the facilities and the location, it is pretty much guaranteed that the elements of the Pakistani government knew about it. It was in their interests to keep everyone else unaware of it, so it's not like coalition intelligence services just missed it on a map or something.

clearly he just forgot to bribe the right/wrong people for that week ...

[plagueship]

shut up, you guys.

let a REAL american teach you how to chant 'usa'

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxVdU2eVYSg

[Pete > You]

I'm a brutal authoritarian because I support consumer health laws?

No, you are because you said it "needs" to be managed.

I cited an example of a right that was taken away and granted back to us. Drinking alcohol legally.

And I'm talking about how we only sorta-kinda-didn't actually really get it back, and we never got back some stuff that went along with it.

Heres another right that was taken away. The right to carry firearms on college campuses. Guess what it's 2011 and now there are many states making it legal to carry firearms on college campuses. Even though just about every police force across the nation believes this will only lead to more deaths on college campuses, the good ole NRA has enough money to get our gun rights back. Let me ask you do you support having guns on college campuses? My second question would be have you gone to school that is infamous for college shootings? Cause I did, and I don't support guns on campuses.

First of all, no. The way this works is that essentially, state-owned colleges were given some degree of home rule in certain states, and over the course of the 20th century, banned the carrying of firearms on campus, which is about as insane and blatant of a violation of the Constitution as I can think of, seeing as how it is state property.

Some states went as far as to legally prohibit it. To my knowledge, only Colorado State never banned the carrying of firearms on campus. Another anomaly is Utah, which has had a law, for years now, that state universities can't prohibit the carrying of firearms. There might be more legislation pending, but both of these cases have been so for years and precious little has changed.

Cops are universal shitheads and they always want to be the "only ones", so fuck them and anything they say.

The NRA exists to bargain my rights away slice by slice. When the histories are written, they'll be cross referenced with judenrat.

I support the complete and total revocation of all existing gun laws, and those responsible for their existence to be prosecuted as having committed treason.

What's a school "known for" violence?